|
VOW |
WOMEN'S MINISTRIES WEBSITE by Deborah Milam Berkley Recently I spent some time looking over the WM website http://www.pcusa.org/women/, which includes around 20 different pages. I found that, from what can be seen on their website, WM represents only some of the women of the PC(USA), those committed to "progressive" and possibly radical feminist theology. The emphasis on the WM website is toward social justice issues, with little attention to Christian growth and almost none to evangelism. In fact, in all the different pages of the website, Jesus is barely mentioned. Except on the pages of the National Network of Presbyterian College Women http://www.pcusa.org/nnpcw/index.htm, where he is mentioned a number of times, and on the pages of Presbyterian Women http://www.pcusa.org/pw/index.htm, where he is mentioned six times, I only found three mentions of Jesus on the entire WM website, and one of those is merely within a quotation from the Bible. There is a lot missing from this website that I would like to see. But before I discuss that, I'd just like to say a word about the website's perspective (and indeed that of WM in general). The slogan of WM is "On Behalf of Women!" Whenever I see that, it bothers me, and I want to say, "It's not about us!" God does not call us to work on behalf of ourselves. He does not even necessarily call us to work on behalf of others who are like us (in this case, other women.) What he does call us to do is to serve him, in whatever way it pleases him to call us. What we are to do is obey him in our particular circumstances. If it happens to be that he calls some of us to work on behalf of women, that is good. But not every woman will be called to that. The Women's Ministries of the PC(USA) needs to have a wider focus in order to accommodate the gifts and ministries of all its women. Moreover, when we first seek our own benefit, our self-centered outlook on life distracts us from God's will. But when we first seek God's will, then a side effect will be our own benefit (Matthew 6:33). Now, to the specifics. The WM website contents include information about the following events or groups: "Celebrate the Gifts of Women Sunday"; "Tending the Flame: Women Called to Lead" (which includes various celebrations of anniversaries of women's ordination milestones); the Office of Women's Advocacy; the Advocacy Committee for Women's Concerns; miscellaneous consultations/training events geared toward social justice; a mission program for women called the Ghana Project; Threads of Justice, which includes information about social justice issues; recommended books; a bibliography of writings by feminist theologians; Racial Ethnic Young Women Together; the National Network of Presbyterian College Women; and Presbyterian Women. There are some topics that WM have covered well. Obviously, they are doing a lot with social justice and with advocacy for women. They are also adept at representing the "progressive" theological point of view. The bibliography of feminist theologians exclusively represents this perspective. However, WM has failed to represent a large segment of the women whose mission dollars contribute to their program. Those of us who are orthodox in belief are completely unrepresented in the PC(USA)'s Women's Ministries. WM are not even living up to their narrow slogan, "On Behalf of Women!", because they are not ministering on behalf of orthodox women. Furthermore, there are problems with some of the items that actually are on the website. Here are some examples:
This sampling shows that the problem is not just
that there are things missing on this website. When I see that they
are promoting books that suggest that Jesus' atonement for our sins is
a doctrine that is unhealthy and destructive for women, I know that something
needs to change! This website is not just unrepresentative; it is
out of line with the Bible and with the Confessions of the PC(USA).
So, what would be better than what is currently found on the WM website?
Here are some things I would like to see that would make it more truly
Presbyterian and more truly representative of the women of the PC(USA):
In addition, here are some programs that I would
love to see offered in a theologically orthodox way by the Women's Ministries
of the PC(USA):
As I was looking at the WM website, I wondered why
the focus of WM was so narrow, focusing only on progressive theology.
Why have they excluded orthodox women, who are such a large segment of
their constituency? Do they think that all women agree with their
point of view? Surely not, for they are intelligent women.
I think, rather, that they believe progressive theology is the only truly
correct point of view. As for the women who don't already agree with
them, WM must have two opinions about them: either they are opinionless
blank slates upon which WM can write their viewpoints, or else they already
disagree with WM, in which case WM has decided to ignore them.
However, WM is not free to ignore those of us who disagree with them, we
who are women with orthodox theology. We have contributed our undesignated
mission giving to WM just as much as anyone else. Moreover, our theological
point of view can be supported in the Bible and the confessions.
We are not outsiders in the PC(USA); in fact, according to the findings
of the Presbyterian Panel, more Presbyterians have conservative theology
than have liberal theology.
With the addition of resources and programs such as those suggested
above, the Women's Ministries of the PC(USA) would no longer be excluding
a large segment of the women of the denomination. We know they value
inclusion. Let us ask them to include us.
|